This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 447–456, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.40
Figure 1: SE image of a deposited FEBID carbon line, top view (a) and FIB cross section (b). The line was dep...
Figure 2: Simulated etching by FEBIE of a planar FEBID surface (a) and the evolution of the sloped sidewalls ...
Figure 3: (a) Top view SE image of the array of EBID deposits along with the etching scheme: The array of etc...
Figure 4: (a–j) Sidewall evolution as a result of the etching series. The frames (a) to (j) show the ten depo...
Figure 5: Resulting profiles for continued etching from below for 3 (a), 10 (b), 20 (c), and 45 (d) consecuti...
Figure 6: Simulations showing the evolution of the half-Gaussian-shaped sidewall (with σ = 200) of a deposit ...
Figure 7: (a) Top view SE image and (b) FIB cross section of an as-deposited FEBID structure.
Figure 8: (a) Top view SE image after etching of the sidewall and (b) after the cleaning step. (c) FIB cross ...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 2753–2765, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.274
Figure 1: (a) A schematic drawing of the focused electron beam induced deposition. (b) A Fokke and Sukke cart...
Figure 2: The Au(I) precursors that were studied (a) experimentally and (b) using density functional theory c...
Figure 3: Synergistic backbonding model [53] for (a) M–CO and (b) M–PX3 complexes.
Figure 4: Crystal structures with aurophilic interactions. The green dashed lines indicate the Au–Au interact...
Figure 5: Crystal structure of MeAuPMe3. Two groups of three molecules (a, b) have a very similar but not equ...
Figure 6: ClAuCO (a) before and (b) after 12 h in vacuum. No changes were observed. For ClAuPMe3 also no chan...
Figure 7: Compositional analysis of Au(I) complexes using EDS. (a) For ClAuCO the Au/Cl ratio was about 1:1, ...
Figure 8: Periodic structure calculations for crystal structures of (a) ClAuCO and (b) AuCl.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 474–480, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.56
Figure 1: (a) An array of dots written at a substrate temperature of 306 K (33 °C) and a dwell time of 3 s pe...
Figure 2: (a) The average deposited mass per dot as a function of substrate temperature and beam current. (b)...
Figure 3: (a) The average deposited mass per dot as a function of dwell time and substrate temperature. The d...
Figure 4: The activation energies for desorption calculated from the data in Figure 2b and Figure 3b.